On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 12:01:49AM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Let's just work on handling it. If we need debug messages to help us > > reach that goal fine. But I don't see many reasons to propagate > > return codes back and forth if caller just prints and ignores it. > > Print it where it's detected :) > > > Adding more debug messages is not the point of this patch though, it > is to break the code flow when an error occurs, not later. Sure we can > add error_report() in vhost_user_write() that would be more consistent > with vhost_user_read() actually.
Yes but we should look for more ways to continue after an error, not for ways to break the flow IMHO. > > -- > Marc-André Lureau
