On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:47:15AM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> writes:
>
> > [ Unknown signature status ]
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:28:30PM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> >> While implementing modulo instructions figured out that the
> >> implementation uses many branches. Change the logic to achieve the
> >> branch-less code. Undefined value is set to dividend in case of invalid
> >> input.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nik...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >> target-ppc/translate.c | 48
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/target-ppc/translate.c b/target-ppc/translate.c
> >> index 7c7328f..69d9ae0 100644
> >> --- a/target-ppc/translate.c
> >> +++ b/target-ppc/translate.c
> >> @@ -1049,41 +1049,39 @@ static void gen_addpcis(DisasContext *ctx)
> >> static inline void gen_op_arith_divw(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv ret, TCGv
> >> arg1,
> >> TCGv arg2, int sign, int compute_ov)
> >> {
> >> - TCGLabel *l1 = gen_new_label();
> >> - TCGLabel *l2 = gen_new_label();
> >> - TCGv_i32 t0 = tcg_temp_local_new_i32();
> >> - TCGv_i32 t1 = tcg_temp_local_new_i32();
> >> + TCGv_i32 t0 = tcg_temp_new_i32();
> >> + TCGv_i32 t1 = tcg_temp_new_i32();
> >> + TCGv_i32 t2 = tcg_temp_new_i32();
> >> + TCGv_i32 t3 = tcg_temp_new_i32();
> >>
> >> tcg_gen_trunc_tl_i32(t0, arg1);
> >> tcg_gen_trunc_tl_i32(t1, arg2);
> >> - tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, t1, 0, l1);
> >> - if (sign) {
> >> - TCGLabel *l3 = gen_new_label();
> >> - tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_NE, t1, -1, l3);
> >> - tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, t0, INT32_MIN, l1);
> >> - gen_set_label(l3);
> >> - tcg_gen_div_i32(t0, t0, t1);
> >> - } else {
> >> - tcg_gen_divu_i32(t0, t0, t1);
> >> - }
> >> - if (compute_ov) {
> >> - tcg_gen_movi_tl(cpu_ov, 0);
> >> - }
> >> - tcg_gen_br(l2);
> >> - gen_set_label(l1);
> >> if (sign) {
> >> - tcg_gen_sari_i32(t0, t0, 31);
> >> + tcg_gen_setcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, t2, t0, INT_MIN);
> >> + tcg_gen_setcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, t3, t1, -1);
> >> + tcg_gen_and_i32(t2, t2, t3);
> >> + tcg_gen_setcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, t3, t1, 0);
> >> + tcg_gen_or_i32(t2, t2, t3);
> >> + tcg_gen_movi_i32(t3, 0);
> >> + tcg_gen_movcond_i32(TCG_COND_NE, t1, t2, t3, t2, t1);
> >> + tcg_gen_div_i32(t3, t0, t1);
> >> + tcg_gen_extu_i32_tl(ret, t3);
> >
> > Should this be a signed extend, given it's a signed divide?
>
> Don't think so, as the instruction is 32-bit, caller will only look at
> the 32bit and div_i32 is signed, it will take care of extending sign
> till 32-boundary.
Hrm. I thought most 32-bit arithmetic operations on Power actually
set the underlying 64-bit registers to a sign extended version of the
32-bit result.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
