Le 11/07/2016 à 18:59, Peter Maydell a écrit : > On 8 July 2016 at 00:17, Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu> wrote: >> TARGET_NR_select can have three different implementations: >> >> 1- to always return -ENOSYS >> >> microblaze, ppc, ppc64 >> >> -> TARGET_WANT_NI_OLD_SELECT >> >> 2- to take parameters from a structure pointed by arg1 >> (kernel sys_old_select) >> >> i386, arm, m68k >> >> -> TARGET_WANT_OLD_SYS_SELECT >> >> 3- to take parameters from arg[1-5] >> (kernel sys_select) >> >> x86_64, alpha, s390x, >> cris, sparc, sparc64 >> >> Some (new) architectures don't define NR_select, >> >> 4- but only NR__newselect with sys_select: >> >> mips, mips64, sh >> >> 5- don't define NR__newselect, and use pselect6 syscall: >> >> aarch64, openrisc, tilegx, unicore32 >> >> Reported-by: Timothy Pearson <tpear...@raptorengineering.com> >> Reported-by: Allan Wirth <awi...@akamai.com> >> Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> >> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu> >> --- > > Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> >
It seems this one has missed 2.7 window, perhaps it can queued for 2.8? Laurent
