Hi

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:58 PM Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote:

> When enabling the sanitizer build it will complain about control
> reaching a non-void function. Normally the compiler should detect that
> there is only one possible exit given a static VNC_SERVER_FB_BYTES.
>
> As we should never get here I added an abort() rather than a default
> return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  ui/vnc-enc-tight.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c b/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c
> index 49df85e..9e4d254 100644
> --- a/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c
> +++ b/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c
> @@ -710,6 +710,8 @@ static bool check_solid_tile(VncState *vs, int x, int
> y, int w, int h,
>      switch (VNC_SERVER_FB_BYTES) {
>      case 4:
>          return check_solid_tile32(vs, x, y, w, h, color, samecolor);
> +    default:
> +        abort();
>      }
>  }
>


Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>

Looks fine. Would it make sense to use a
G_STATIC_ASSERT(VNC_SERVER_FB_BYTES == 4) above instead?
-- 
Marc-André Lureau

Reply via email to