> On 17 Dec 2016, at 08:34, Wouter Verhelst <w...@uter.be> wrote: > > I've therefore removed that restriction as well as the "255 bytes max" > one that you added, since I don't think they make much sense. That > doesn't mean I can't be convinced otherwise by good arguments, but > they'd have to be very good ones ;-)
But we were at cross purposes. I was talking about the return from queries, and you've adjusted namespaces (in toto). I've fixed up your edit slightly, and brought the return for queries in line with it. I hope this nit is now dead! -- Alex Bligh
