On 02/22/2017 10:44 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
* SO and OV reflects overflow of the 64-bit result in 64-bit mode and
overflow of the low-order 32-bit result in 32-bit mode
* OV32 reflects overflow of the low-order 32-bit independent of the mode
Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nik...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
target/ppc/translate.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/ppc/translate.c b/target/ppc/translate.c
index f3f92aa..43366e7 100644
--- a/target/ppc/translate.c
+++ b/target/ppc/translate.c
@@ -809,10 +809,19 @@ static inline void gen_op_arith_compute_ov(DisasContext
*ctx, TCGv arg0,
tcg_gen_andc_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, t0);
}
tcg_temp_free(t0);
- if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
- tcg_gen_ext32s_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov);
+ if (is_isa300(ctx)) {
+ tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov32, cpu_ov, 31, 1);
+ if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
+ tcg_gen_mov_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov32);
+ } else {
+ tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, 63, 1);
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
+ tcg_gen_ext32s_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov);
+ }
+ tcg_gen_shri_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, TARGET_LONG_BITS - 1);
}
- tcg_gen_shri_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, TARGET_LONG_BITS - 1);
We're computing this two different ways for no reason. How about
if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, 31, 1);
if (is_isa300(ctx)) {
tcg_gen_mov_tl(cpu_ov32, cpu_ov);
}
} else {
if (is_isa300(ctx)) {
tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov32, cpu_ov, 31, 1);
}
tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, 63, 1);
}
r~