On Tue, 02/28 13:53, Kevin Wolf wrote: > This series is the first part of implementing the new op blocker system > whose design was agreed on quite a while ago, but proved a bit tricky to > implement in places. There is more work to do to fully replace the old op > blocker system, but realistically we don't have that much time until the 2.9 > freeze. So let's merge this series to complement the traditional op blockers > and plan with a second part for the 2.10 timeframe.
If we don't merge this, what should we do during the lengthy winter^Wfreeze? ;-) Seriously, the series looks pretty good to me. I didn't leave my rev-by patch by patch when reviewing previous versions, because I focused on my overall happiness on the API (frankly, I was a bit skeptical about the apparent complexity of this at the first sight). Now that I think I am happy, and also as I don't have time for a blanket review on the whole series today that upholds a full rev-by, I'm going to give: Acked-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
