Am 20.04.2017 um 16:08 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
> Am 20.04.2017 um 16:05 schrieb Fam Zheng:
> >On Tue, 02/28 14:35, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>img_convert has been around before there was an ImgConvertState or
> >>a block backend, but it has never been modified to directly use
> >>these structs. Change this by parsing parameters directly into
> >>the ImgConvertState and directly use BlockBackend where possible.
> >>Futhermore variable initalization has been reworked and sorted.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <p...@kamp.de>
> >I see an iotest failure with this patch, in Kevin's block-next tree:
> >
> >019 1s ... - output mismatch (see 019.out.bad)
> >--- /stor/work/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/019.out       2017-04-17 
> >16:19:56.523968474 +0800
> >+++ 019.out.bad      2017-04-20 22:03:29.868216955 +0800
> >@@ -1086,8 +1086,8 @@
> >  Checking if backing clusters are allocated when they shouldn't
> >-0/128 sectors allocated at offset 1 MiB
> >-0/128 sectors allocated at offset 4.001 GiB
> >+128/128 sectors allocated at offset 1 MiB
> >+128/128 sectors allocated at offset 4.001 GiB
> >  Reading
> >  === IO: pattern 42
> >Failures: 019
> >Failed 1 of 1 tests
> 
> Thanks for notifying, Fam.
> 
> @Kevin: Can you drop the patch again? I will send a V2 addressing this
> issue and the other comments I have got.

I could, but if it doesn't take too long, I'd prefer to only do so when
v2 is there. There are already a few conflicting patches and I asked
their authors to rebase onto yours, so it wouldn't be nice if they
wouldn't apply again because I removed your patch...

Kevin

Reply via email to