Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > >> On 22 June 2017 at 19:08, Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On 22.06.2017 19:50, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: >>>> Could do; I'm just not finding tiny header files with one or >>>> two entries each that useful. >> >> Well, it means that the bulk of code that doesn't care about the >> types doesn't get its compilation fractionally slowed by having >> to parse the typedef anyway. In general I think we're drifting >> towards "have each .c file get fewer things automatically" rather >> than otherwise (eg more finely focused files rather than stuffing >> everything into qemu-common.h). > > Yes. See also "Our use of #include is undisciplined, and what to do > about it" > Message-ID: <87wpp4m6n1....@blackfin.pond.sub.org> > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg03271.html > > I have some unfinished work towards emptying out qemu-common.h. Need > to find the time to finish it. > > [...]
YES!!!!! Once there, we can also do other cleanups. inclufde/sysemu/sysemu.h have things not related at all. I want to get rid of it on migration, because you know, we do zero emulation there, but there are things like "runstate" that are defined there. I removed on that version lots of migration functionality that were there, just from historical reasons, not because they belong there. Later, Juan.
