On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 05:46:19 -1000, Richard Henderson wrote: > I do wonder if we should provide a generic empty hook, so that a target that > does not need a particular hook need not define an empty function. It could > just put e.g. "translator_noop" into the structure. Ok, maybe a better name > than that...
NULL would serve that purpose well. The subsequent "if (hook)" branch
would be essentially free because it'd be trivially predicted.
E.
