Emilio G Cota writes: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 05:46:19 -1000, Richard Henderson wrote: >> I do wonder if we should provide a generic empty hook, so that a target that >> does not need a particular hook need not define an empty function. It could >> just put e.g. "translator_noop" into the structure. Ok, maybe a better name >> than that...
> NULL would serve that purpose well. The subsequent "if (hook)" branch > would be essentially free because it'd be trivially predicted. Someone (Richard? can't remember exactly) already objected to using NULL. Cheers, Lluis
