On 26/07/2017 12:53, Eric Blake wrote: > > GNU coreutils online help: <http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/> > Full documentation at: <http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/ls> > or available locally via: info '(coreutils) ls invocation' > > or 'm4 --help | tail -n3': > Report bugs to: bug...@gnu.org > GNU M4 home page: <http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/> > General help using GNU software: <http://www.gnu.org/gethelp/> > > In our executables, we are rather inconsistent with --help > > qemu-nbd mentions: Report bugs to <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> > qemu-ga mentions: Report bugs to <mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > while qemu-system-*, qemu-img, and qemu-io mention nothing at all. Is > it worth unifying these to all mention qemu-devel@nongnu.org as the > primary bug-report site, and/or to add mention of <http://qemu.org> as a > site for further information?
I think we should point to a more specific bugreport URL. Currently it's http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/ReportABug. If we want an URL on qemu.org, we can either add a redirect from qemu.org to the wiki, or move the contents to qemu.org (it's static enough that it shouldn't be a big issue). I've sent out a patch for the latter. > Likewise, with --version, qemu-io and qemu-ga lack the git suffix > present in qemu-system-* and just added in qemu-nbd. > > I can submit patches to make things consistent, and think it is 2.10 > material, but first want to get consensus on what the behavior should be. I agree it's better to be consistent. Paolo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
