On 07/28/2017 05:42 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 27 July 2017 at 23:58, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> wrote:
On 07/27/2017 07:43 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 07/27/2017 07:59 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
[...]
- u32p += env->cp15.c6_rgnr;
+ u32p += env->pmsav7.rnr;
tlb_flush(CPU(cpu)); /* Mappings may have changed - purge! */
*u32p = value;
}
@@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo pmsav7_cp_reginfo[] = {
.readfn = pmsav7_read, .writefn = pmsav7_write, .resetfn =
pmsav7_reset },
{ .name = "RGNR", .cp = 15, .crn = 6, .opc1 = 0, .crm = 2, .opc2 =
0,
"RGNR" -> "RNR"
Ah "RGNR" for -R and "RNR" for -M hmmm... still better keep the name
matching the field, "rnr".
It's a bit awkward, yes -- we're going to get a mismatch one way
or the other.
In this patch I wanted only to change the field name, not
anything else (it's already a bit borderline for 2.10).
Fine by me for what's worth. So either ways:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
thanks
-- PMM
