On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 05:04:18PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Spotted thanks to valgrind and tests/device-introspect-test:
> 
> ==11711== 1 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 6 of 14,537
> ==11711==    at 0x4C2EB6B: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
> ==11711==    by 0x1E0CDBD8: g_malloc (gmem.c:94)
> ==11711==    by 0x1E0E696E: g_strdup (gstrfuncs.c:363)
> ==11711==    by 0x695693: migration_instance_init (migration.c:2226)
> ==11711==    by 0x717C4B: object_init_with_type (object.c:344)
> ==11711==    by 0x717E80: object_initialize_with_type (object.c:375)
> ==11711==    by 0x7182EB: object_new_with_type (object.c:483)
> ==11711==    by 0x718328: object_new (object.c:493)
> ==11711==    by 0x4B8A29: qmp_device_list_properties (qmp.c:542)
> ==11711==    by 0x4A9561: qmp_marshal_device_list_properties 
> (qmp-marshal.c:1425)
> ==11711==    by 0x819D4A: do_qmp_dispatch (qmp-dispatch.c:104)
> ==11711==    by 0x819E82: qmp_dispatch (qmp-dispatch.c:131)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu

Reply via email to