Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> wrote: > Spotted thanks to valgrind and tests/device-introspect-test: > > ==11711== 1 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 6 of 14,537 > ==11711== at 0x4C2EB6B: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299) > ==11711== by 0x1E0CDBD8: g_malloc (gmem.c:94) > ==11711== by 0x1E0E696E: g_strdup (gstrfuncs.c:363) > ==11711== by 0x695693: migration_instance_init (migration.c:2226) > ==11711== by 0x717C4B: object_init_with_type (object.c:344) > ==11711== by 0x717E80: object_initialize_with_type (object.c:375) > ==11711== by 0x7182EB: object_new_with_type (object.c:483) > ==11711== by 0x718328: object_new (object.c:493) > ==11711== by 0x4B8A29: qmp_device_list_properties (qmp.c:542) > ==11711== by 0x4A9561: qmp_marshal_device_list_properties > (qmp-marshal.c:1425) > ==11711== by 0x819D4A: do_qmp_dispatch (qmp-dispatch.c:104) > ==11711== by 0x819E82: qmp_dispatch (qmp-dispatch.c:131) > > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>