* Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote: > Hi; I noticed today that the virt board doesn't have a virt-2.10 > machine type defined. Do we need to add it before release? > > (I don't know if there have in fact been any changes between > 2.9 and 2.10 that would be compatibility issues.)
I think there's two sub questions: a) The virt-2.9 needs to pick up HW_COMPAT_2_9 if anything in it is relevant for ARM b) If anything is relevant in it for ARM then you probably want a virt-2.10 so that you can take advantage of whatever was changed that needed compatibility adding in HW_COMPAT_2_9 (The other thing is figuring out what we missed in HW_COMPAT_2_9, we normally miss something). Dave > thanks > -- PMM -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
