On 04/08/2017 19:48, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: >> >> (I don't know if there have in fact been any changes between >> 2.9 and 2.10 that would be compatibility issues.) > I think there's two sub questions: > a) The virt-2.9 needs to pick up HW_COMPAT_2_9 if anything > in it is relevant for ARM
Except for intel-iommu, everything else in HW_COMPAT_2_9 is relevant for virt-2.9. This implies that a virt-2.10 would be useful too. Paolo > b) If anything is relevant in it for ARM then you probably > want a virt-2.10 so that you can take advantage of whatever > was changed that needed compatibility adding in HW_COMPAT_2_9
