On 01.09.2017 11:10, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> writes:
>
>>> static void test_drive_del_device_del(void)
>>> {
>>> + char *args;
>>> +
>>> /* Start with a drive used by a device that unplugs instantaneously */
>>> - qtest_start("-drive if=none,id=drive0,file=null-co://,format=raw"
>>> - " -device virtio-scsi-pci"
>>> - " -device scsi-hd,drive=drive0,id=dev0");
>>> + args = g_strdup_printf("-drive
>>> if=none,id=drive0,file=null-co://,format=raw"
>>> + " -device virtio-scsi-%s"
>>> + " -device scsi-hd,drive=drive0,id=dev0",
>>
>> Would look better with the spaces at the end of the previous line (so
>> all "-device" are aligned), but just my taste.
>
> The -device *are* aligned, but I get what you mean.
>
> The advantage of leading rather than trailing space is that the
> intention "this is still the same string" is locally obvious both at the
> first part's end (no comma) and at the second part's beginning (leading
> space).
I don't mind either way, but in this case, I think I'd prefer to keep
the original formatting with the space at the beginning, for the
following two reasons:
- The first line is already hitting the 80 columns limit, and I want to
avoid complaints from checkpatch.pl
- The original author formatted it that way.
Thomas
