On 7 October 2017 at 00:48, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a follow-up of Marc-André's clang-tidy series [1].
> While chatting we realized we were trying to reach the same goal, Marc-André
> using clang-tidy and me using spatch; so he let me finish his series applying
> my changes over his.
> I also included Jan's patch which fits well.
>
> Summary:
> - 1 bugfix (memory leak)
> - few optimizations (avoid to zeroise when all memory is assigned)
> - bunch of mechanical refactors

88 patches is way too many for a single series, even if it is
mostly mechanical.

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to