Am 04.10.2017 um 04:00 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: > There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS, > but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the > reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even > much higher levels). I've therefore started the task of > converting our block status code to report at a byte granularity > rather than sectors. > > Now that 2.11 is open, I'm rebasing/reposting the remaining patches. > > The overall conversion currently looks like: > part 1: bdrv_is_allocated (merged, commit 51b0a488) > part 2: dirty-bitmap (v10 is queued [1]) > part 3: bdrv_get_block_status (this series, v4 at [2]) > part 4: .bdrv_co_block_status (v3 is posted [4], mostly reviewed) > > Available as a tag at: > git fetch git://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git nbd-byte-status-v4 > > Based-on: <20170925145526.32690-1-ebl...@redhat.com> > ([PATCH v10 00/20] make dirty-bitmap byte-based) > Based-on: <20171004014347.25099-1-ebl...@redhat.com> > ([PATCH v2 0/5] block: Avoid copy-on-read assertions)
We merged v3 of that series, which causes merge conflicts in this one. I can try to give the patches a look without applying them, but can you rebase, please? Kevin
