On 23.11.2017 11:17, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 23 November 2017 at 10:03, Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 08:14:28 +0100 >> Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> By the way, before everybody now introduces "2.12" machine types ... is >>> there already a consensus that the next version will be "2.12" ? >>> >>> A couple of months ago, we discussed that we could maybe do a 3.0 after >>> 2.11, e.g. here: >>> >>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-03/msg05056.html >>> >>> I'd still like to see that happen... Peter, any thoughts on this? >> >> So, as I just thought about preparing the new machine for s390x as >> well: Did we reach any consensus about what the next qemu version will >> be called? > > I haven't seen any sufficiently solid plan to make me want to > pick anything except "2.12".
I still don't think that we need a big plan for this... The change from 1.7 to 2.0 was also rather arbitrary, wasn't it? Anyway, I've now started a Wiki page to collect ideas: https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/Version3.0 Maybe we can jump to version 3.0 if there are enough doable items on the list that we can all agree upon. I've put "--accel kvm:hax:tcg" also on the doable list since I don't remember any objections to that idea so far -- feel free to move it to the controversial list instead if you think it needs more discussion. Thomas
