On 23/11/2017 12:57, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 23.11.2017 12:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 23/11/2017 11:57, Thomas Huth wrote: > [...] >>> I've put "--accel kvm:hax:tcg" also on the doable list since I don't >>> remember any objections to that idea so far -- feel free to move it to >>> the controversial list instead if you think it needs more discussion. >> >> "hax" is very far from feature parity with TCG, it doesn't even support >> CPUID (-cpu). "-accel kvm:hvf:tcg" could be a possibility, but only if >> we have resources to test it. As far as I know the only active x86 >> developer who owns a Mac is Igor? > > hvf hasn't been merged yet ... do you expect it to hit master after 2.11 > has been released?
Yes, more or less. > Otherwise, we should maybe rather simply go with > "--accel kvm:tcg"? Yes, HVF can come later. Paolo
