On 11/28/2017 02:46 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > info qom-tree shows several devices under unattached that probably > should go somewhere.
I think this was reported by me. See MID: <76f95c6f-641e-2fe0-73b4-3ab24fc1a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> I would not mind a Reported-by: Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>. Or do you see this differently? If these are bugs. I would prefer commit messages and titles reflecting this fact. Otherwise at first glance both patches seem sane. Regards, Halil > > The css bridge should attach to the machine, as it has a similar > purpose as e.g. a pci host bridge. > > The autogenerated network devices should be in the same bucket as any > other device; I'm just not sure about the way I went about it. > > The zpci devices are still problematic: I don't have a good idea where > they should show up. > > Remaining in the unattached container are the sysbus, memory regions > and cpus. > > Cornelia Huck (2): > s390x/css: attach css bridge > s390x: attach autogenerated nics > > hw/s390x/css-bridge.c | 2 ++ > hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) >
