On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 02:57:45PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 09:49:16PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 02:11:29PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:08:59PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > Use _RMV method to indicate whether device can be removed. > > > > > > > > Data is retrieved from QEMU via I/O port 0xae0c. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com> > > > > > > Thanks Marcelo, > > > > > > Can you add acked-bys from the qemu/kvm maintaners? > > > > > Marcelo is kvm maintainer ;) FWIW I tested this with Windows 7 & XP > > and it works as expected. The patch relies on patch not yes excepted > > to qemu though. > > Yeah - I know - but I figured I'd ask for concensus before committing. > :-) > > The committing of seabios patches that have a dependency on qemu/kvm > is an area that I think could be better clarified. I'm thinking that > if the seabios part depends on something in qemu/kvm then we should > have the corresponding kvm/qemu maintaners "ack" it. > > -Kevin
Avi, are you OK with this patch ? Yes, perhaps it all (including PCI hotplug controller) should be using something else than hardcoded IO ports, but thats what we have now.