On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:56:48 +0000 Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 26 February 2018 at 10:42, Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Cornelia! > > > > The following changes since commit 0a773d55ac76c5aa89ed9187a3bc5af8c5c2a6d0: > > > > maintainers: Add myself as a OpenBSD maintainer (2018-02-23 12:05:07 > > +0000) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > https://github.com/huth/qemu.git tags/s390-ccw-bios-2018-02-26 > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 9c050f3d15697c4c84c9d6aa7af779a273b71d87: > > > > pc-bios/s390: Rebuild the s390x firmware images with the boot menu > > changes (2018-02-26 11:10:30 +0100) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Boot menu patches by Collin L. Walling > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > I thought we'd agreed on 'PULL SUBSYSTEM whatever' rather than > 'PULL-for-whatever' ? I guess it doesn't matter much what > convention we use but we should have one... My guess is that > gmail's less-than-fantastic filtering functionality is going > to be happier with a separate-words-phrase like 'PULL SUBSYSTEM' > than a prefix-of-a-word like 'pull-for-', though. Whatever works best... I'm happy with 'PULL SUBSYSTEM', as log as there's s390x in it :)
