On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 09:07:17 +0100 Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 03/04/2018 02:45 PM, Nia Alarie wrote: > > These functions always return 0. By changing their return type to > > void, some dead code can be removed. > > the event facility part looks ok, but I am asking myself if we should > go a step further. > Do we need the exit callback at all? We can certainly keep it for reasons of > symmetry > but it looks like the other event handlers (quiesce and cpu) do not define it > at all. > I addition to that, I have a hard time imagine a usecase for such an exit > handler. Agreed. I think we should just remove them. [I dimly remember having that discussion before...]
