On 03/27/2018 01:41 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
Some backends report big max_io_sectors. Making min_io_size the same
value in this case will make it impossible for guest to align memory,
therefore the disk may not be usable at all.

Do not enlarge them when they are zero.

Reported-by: David Gibson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <[email protected]>

---

v2: Leave the values alone if zero. [Paolo]
     At least we can consult block layer for a slightly more sensible
     opt_io_size, but that's for another patch.
---
  hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c | 10 ++++++----
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
index f5ab767ab5..f8ed8cf2b4 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
@@ -714,10 +714,12 @@ static int scsi_disk_emulate_inquiry(SCSIRequest *req, 
uint8_t *outbuf)

                  /* min_io_size and opt_io_size can't be greater than
                   * max_io_sectors */
-                min_io_size =
-                    MIN_NON_ZERO(min_io_size, max_io_sectors);
-                opt_io_size =
-                    MIN_NON_ZERO(opt_io_size, max_io_sectors);
+                if (min_io_size) {
+                    min_io_size = MIN(min_io_size, max_io_sectors);
+                }
+                if (opt_io_size) {
+                    opt_io_size = MIN(opt_io_size, max_io_sectors);
+                }
              }
              /* required VPD size with unmap support */
              buflen = 0x40;

Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <[email protected]>


Reply via email to