On 04/10/2018 11:45 PM, Bastian Koppelmann wrote:
> On 04/10/2018 03:40 PM, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 15:16:19 +0200, Bastian Koppelmann wrote:
>>> On 04/10/2018 03:03 PM, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 14:24:23 +1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>>>> On 04/10/2018 02:11 AM, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 16:01:36 +0200, Bastian Koppelmann wrote:
>>>>>>> Thanks for doing this grunt work. Me and a colleague were planning to do
>>>>>>> this as well after converting the RISC-V frontend to decodetree. Do you
>>>>>>> have any plans to do this for the TriCore frontend as well? I have the
>>>>>>> same plan for Tricore: Convert it to decodetree, then to translation 
>>>>>>> loop.
>>>>>> I won't do any further conversions in the near future, so please go
>>>>>> ahead with your plans :-)
>>>>> In which case I won't review Emilio's final two patches for risc-v.
>>> I'm confused as well :). I don't understand why Richard is not reviewing
>>> the last two patch. Maybe you can clarify as well, Richard.
>> I think he understood you already had patches (not yet on-list) to do the
>> trloop conversion for riscv, and therefore my patches should be discarded.
> No, I don't have patches.

Ah, right.  Misunderstanding on my part.
I'll get back to the risc-v patches soon.

>> Note that the first patch in this series does change the TranslatorOps
>> interface, that's why I think the whole series should go
>> through the same tree (Richard's TCG tree, I presume).
> Works for me.

That's fine with me too.


Reply via email to