On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 20:21:31 +0200 Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 04/16/2018 05:44 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > >> > >> diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c > >> index 0cdbc15..0d5b0f7 100644 > >> --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c > >> +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c > >> @@ -447,6 +447,9 @@ static uint16_t full_GEN12_GA1[] = { > >> S390_FEAT_ADAPTER_INT_SUPPRESSION, > >> S390_FEAT_EDAT_2, > >> S390_FEAT_SIDE_EFFECT_ACCESS_ESOP2, > >> + S390_FEAT_AP_QUERY_CONFIG_INFO, > >> + S390_FEAT_AP_FACILITIES_TEST, > >> + S390_FEAT_AP, > >> }; > >> > > > > Now I have to ask a very stupid question: > > > > I heard that the execution controls in the SIE block for AP are one of > > the oldest ones we have around. How can it be that the AP feature cannot > > be used before zEC12? > > It was a suggestion from the crypto team due to testability. Nobody has a z196 > with the older cards. > Might be worth adding a note to that respect?