On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 12:48:21 +0200
David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04.06.2018 14:05, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2018 13:37:06 +0200
> > David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This allows a guest to change its TOD. We already take care of updating
> >> all CKC timers from within S390TODClass.
> >>
> >> Use MO_ALIGN to load the operand manually - this will properly trigger a
> >> SPECIFICATION exception.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> target/s390x/helper.h | 1 +
> >> target/s390x/insn-data.def | 3 +--
> >> target/s390x/misc_helper.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> target/s390x/translate.c | 9 +++++++++
> >> 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> >> diff --git a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
> >> index 2ef9de1cca..2f5cd6d22a 100644
> >> --- a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
> >> +++ b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
> >> @@ -191,6 +191,25 @@ void tcg_s390_tod_updated(CPUState *cs,
> >> run_on_cpu_data opaque)
> >> helper_sckc(env, env->ckc);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +/* Set Clock */
> >> +uint32_t HELPER(sck)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t tod_low)
> >> +{
> >> + S390TODState *td = s390_get_tod();
> >> + S390TODClass *tdc = S390_TOD_GET_CLASS(td);
> >
> > Would it make sense to cache the class as well?
>
> Probably, but I don't think this is as critical as the flic (as this
> code is TCG only and the class conversion should be fairly fast compared
> to a device lookup).
Yes, it probably does not matter that much. Do as you like :)
