On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Stefan Weil <w...@mail.berlios.de> wrote: > Currently, most QEMU code assumes that pointers and long integers have > the same size, typically 32 bit on 32 bit hosts, 64 bit on 64 bit hosts. > > While this assumption works on QEMU's major hosts, it is not generally true. > > There exist 64 bit host OS which use an ABI with 32 bit long integers, > maybe to be more compatible with an older 32 bit OS version, so here is > sizeof(long) < sizeof(void *).
Oh, that OS-Which-Must-Not-Be-Named. > Other ABIs might use "near" pointers which may reduce code size and improve > code speed. This results in sizeof(long) > sizeof(void *). > > Both cases will break current QEMU, because lots of code lines use > type casts from pointer to long or vice versa like these two examples: > > start = (long)mmap((void *)host_start, host_len ... > code_gen_ptr = (void *)(((unsigned long)code_gen_ptr + ...)) > > Both variants (unsigned long) and (long) can be found (relation 3:2). > > Changing the existing limitation of QEMU's code simply needs replacing > all those type casts, variable declarations and printf format specifiers > by portable code. > > The standard integral type which matches the size of a pointer is defined > in stdint.h (which also defines int8_t, ...). It is intptr_t (signed > version) > or uintptr_t (unsigned version). There is no need to use both. > > => Replace (unsigned long), (long) type casts of pointers by (uintptr_t). > > All variables (auto, struct members, parameters) which hold such values > must be fixed, too. In the following examples, ptr_var is of that kind. > > => Replace unsigned long ptr_var, long ptr_var by uintptr_t ptr_var. > > Finally, the fixed variables are used in printf-like statements, > so here the format specifier needs a change. inttypes.h defines > PRIxPTR which should be used. > > => Replace "%lx" by "%" PRIxPTR to print the integer value ptr_var. > > A single patch which includes all these changes touches 39 files. > Splitting it into smaller patches is not trivial because of cross > dependencies. Because of its size, it will raise merge conflicts > when it is not applied soon. > > Would these kind of changes be interesting for QEMU? Does QEMU work in OS-Which-Must-Not-Be-Named when the patch is applied? > Are there suggestions how it should be done? The change, done properly, should not cause any problems for most other hosts, where unsigned long size equals pointer type size. > What about ram_addr_t? Should it be replaced by uintptr_t? I'd use typedef uintptr_t ram_addr_t; > Should we use macros like QEMU_PTR2UINT(p), QEMU_UINT2PTR(u)? Rather, inline functions if open coding is not clear. > My current version of the patch is available from > http://qemu.weilnetz.de/0001-Fix-conversions-from-pointer-to-integral-type-and-vi.patch. Some comments: The patch changes also signed longs to uintptr_t. That could introduce regressions, so please use signed/unsigned as original. For example in cpu_physical_memory_reset_dirty() you didn't change length, but that should probably become uintptr_t too. */translate.c: exit_tb() helper uses tcg_target_long, so the cast should use that instead.