On 07/27/2018 10:13 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Leaving interpolation into JSON to qmp() is more robust than building
QMP input manually, as explained in the recent commit "tests: Clean up
string interpolation into QMP input (simple cases)".

migration-test.c interpolates strings into JSON in a few places:

* migrate_set_parameter() interpolates string parameter @value as a
   JSON number.  Change it to long long.  This requires changing
   migrate_check_parameter() similarly.

* migrate_set_capability() interpolates string parameter @value as a
   JSON boolean.  Change it to bool.

* deprecated_set_speed() interpolates string parameter @value as a
   JSON number.  Change it to long long.

Bonus: gets rid of non-literal format strings.  A step towards
compile-time format string checking without triggering
-Wformat-nonliteral.

Cc: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>
---
  tests/migration-test.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------
  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/migration-test.c b/tests/migration-test.c
index 1c1e56b15b..132c30891d 100644
--- a/tests/migration-test.c
+++ b/tests/migration-test.c
@@ -315,31 +315,25 @@ static void cleanup(const char *filename)
  }
static void migrate_check_parameter(QTestState *who, const char *parameter,
-                                    const char *value)
+                                    long long value)
  {
      QDict *rsp_return;
-    char *result;
rsp_return = wait_command(who,
                                "{ 'execute': 'query-migrate-parameters' }");
-    result = g_strdup_printf("%" PRId64,
-                             qdict_get_try_int(rsp_return,  parameter, -1));
-    g_assert_cmpstr(result, ==, value);

The old code allows defaulting to -1 if the value is not present;

-    g_free(result);
+    g_assert_cmpint(qdict_get_int(rsp_return,  parameter), ==, value);

the new code requires the value to be found. Matters if any of the callers passed "-1" in the old code, but a search of the file doesn't spot any such callers. So I think you're okay.

Also, while touching this line, it would be nice to get rid of the double space before parameter.

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Reply via email to