On (Thu) 17 Feb 2011 [07:11:44], Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/17/2011 07:03 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >On (Tue) 15 Feb 2011 [10:10:23], Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >>>diff --git a/hw/virtio-serial.h b/hw/virtio-serial.h
> >>>index a308196..2c5e336 100644
> >>>--- a/hw/virtio-serial.h
> >>>+++ b/hw/virtio-serial.h
> >>>@@ -57,6 +57,19 @@ struct virtio_console_control {
> >>>
> >>> /* == In-qemu interface == */
> >>>
> >>>+#define PROP_VIRTSERIAL_IS_CONSOLE_DESC \
> >>>+ "An hvc console will be spawned in the guest if this is set."
> >>>+
> >>>+#define PROP_VIRTSERIAL_NR_DESC \
> >>>+ "The 'number' for the port for predictable port numbers. Use this to
> >>>" \
> >>>+ "spawn ports if you plan to migrate the guest."
> >>>+
> >>>+#define PROP_VIRTSERIAL_CHR_DESC \
> >>>+ "The chardev to associate this port with."
> >>>+
> >>>+#define PROP_VIRTSERIAL_NAME_DESC \
> >>>+ "Name for the port that's exposed to the guest for port discovery."
> >>>+
> >>Why are you using a #define instead of inlining the docs?
> >These are shared by the generic and console ports.
>
> Are the properties the same? Should a common properties define be
> used like with network and disk devices?
Yes, that's something that needs to be done, at least for NR and NAME
properties.
Amit
