On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 08:39:20PM +0200, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > On Sunday 20 February 2011 20:24:46 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > The fix looks fine, but the resulting code is probably over > > engineered... What about: > > > > s->enable = (value & 9) == 1; > > > > ? > > Looks OK to me. >
Can you please provide a new version with that code instead, I'll apply it. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
