On 25 August 2018 at 08:47, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> They are not consecutive with DAC1_FRAME* and DAC2_FRAME*.
>
> Fixes: 154c1d1f960c5147a3f8ef00907504112f271cd8
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/audio/es1370.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/audio/es1370.c b/hw/audio/es1370.c
> index dd75c9e8f5..4f980a598b 100644
> --- a/hw/audio/es1370.c
> +++ b/hw/audio/es1370.c
> @@ -506,10 +506,13 @@ static void es1370_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> uint64_t val, unsigned size)
> d - &s->chan[0], val >> 16, (val & 0xffff));
> break;
>
> + case ES1370_REG_ADC_FRAMEADR:
> + d += 2;
> + goto frameadr;
> case ES1370_REG_DAC1_FRAMEADR:
> case ES1370_REG_DAC2_FRAMEADR:
> - case ES1370_REG_ADC_FRAMEADR:
> d += (addr - ES1370_REG_DAC1_FRAMEADR) >> 3;
> + frameadr:
> d->frame_addr = val;
> ldebug ("chan %td frame address %#x\n", d - &s->chan[0], val);
> break;
> @@ -521,10 +524,13 @@ static void es1370_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> uint64_t val, unsigned size)
> lwarn ("writing to phantom frame address %#x\n", val);
> break;
>
> + case ES1370_REG_ADC_FRAMECNT:
> + d += 2;
> + goto framecnt;
> case ES1370_REG_DAC1_FRAMECNT:
> case ES1370_REG_DAC2_FRAMECNT:
> - case ES1370_REG_ADC_FRAMECNT:
> d += (addr - ES1370_REG_DAC1_FRAMECNT) >> 3;
> + framecnt:
> d->frame_cnt = val;
> d->leftover = 0;
> ldebug ("chan %td frame count %d, buffer size %d\n",
Hi Paolo; I've just noticed that this patch (now commit cf9270e522067)
fixed the es1370_write() but left the code in es1370_read() unfixed.
Coverity complains in CID 1395185 (though oddly only about the
ADC_FRAMECNT case, not the ADC_FRAMEADR one).
thanks
-- PMM
