From: Aleksandar Markovic <amarko...@wavecomp.com> Remove some spurious R5900-related comments. Very similar comments are in the vicinity of the area in question, and in file translate.c.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Markovic <smarko...@wavecomp.com> Signed-off-by: Aleksandar Markovic <amarko...@wavecomp.com> --- target/mips/translate_init.inc.c | 12 ------------ 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/mips/translate_init.inc.c b/target/mips/translate_init.inc.c index 85da4a2..cab2003 100644 --- a/target/mips/translate_init.inc.c +++ b/target/mips/translate_init.inc.c @@ -411,18 +411,6 @@ const mips_def_t mips_defs[] = .mmu_type = MMU_TYPE_R4000, }, { - /* - * The Toshiba TX System RISC TX79 Core Architecture manual - * - * https://wiki.qemu.org/File:C790.pdf - * - * describes the C790 processor that is a follow-up to the R5900. - * There are a few notable differences in that the R5900 FPU - * - * - is not IEEE 754-1985 compliant, - * - does not implement double format, and - * - its machine code is nonstandard. - */ .name = "R5900", .CP0_PRid = 0x00002E00, /* No L2 cache, icache size 32k, dcache size 32k, uncached coherency. */ -- 2.7.4