Am 31.10.2018 um 22:56 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben:
> aio_worker() for reads and writes isn't boring enough yet. It still does
> some postprocessing for handling short reads and turning the result into
> the right return value.
>
> However, there is no reason why handle_aiocb_rw() couldn't do the same,
> and even without duplicating code between the read and write path. So
> move the code there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
> @@ -1354,7 +1356,21 @@ static ssize_t handle_aiocb_rw(RawPosixAIOData *aiocb)
> }
> qemu_vfree(buf);
>
> - return nbytes;
> +out:
> + if (nbytes == aiocb->aio_nbytes) {
> + return 0;
> + } else if (nbytes >= 0 && nbytes < aiocb->aio_nbytes) {
> + if (aiocb->aio_type & QEMU_AIO_WRITE) {
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> + iov_memset(aiocb->io.iov, aiocb->io.niov, nbytes,
> + 0, aiocb->aio_nbytes - nbytes);
> + return aiocb->aio_nbytes;
While reviewing Eric's patches, I noticed that this should be return 0.
Fixing it in my queue.
Kevin
