On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 03:17:52PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > There's no reason to violate our naming conventions by having a > struct with a different name than its typedef. Messed up since > its introduction in commit 8c85901e, but made more obvious when > commit 3bfe5716 promoted it to typedefs.h. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Queued on numa-next, thanks. -- Eduardo
