Hi

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 3:22 PM Li Qiang <liq...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The fcntl will change the flags directly, use qemu_set_nonblock()
> instead.

qemu_set_nonblock() will preserve the existing flags. And on windows,
it will register the FD to the event loop.
that's a reasonable thing to do, is this fixing an actual bug?

>
> Signed-off-by: Li Qiang <liq...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/tap.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/tap.c b/net/tap.c
> index cc8525f154..e8aadd8d4b 100644
> --- a/net/tap.c
> +++ b/net/tap.c
> @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ int net_init_bridge(const Netdev *netdev, const char 
> *name,
>          return -1;
>      }
>
> -    fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
> +    qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
>      vnet_hdr = tap_probe_vnet_hdr(fd);
>      s = net_tap_fd_init(peer, "bridge", name, fd, vnet_hdr);
>
> @@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ static void net_init_tap_one(const NetdevTapOptions *tap, 
> NetClientState *peer,
>                  }
>                  return;
>              }
> -            fcntl(vhostfd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
> +            qemu_set_nonblock(vhostfd);
>          }
>          options.opaque = (void *)(uintptr_t)vhostfd;
>
> @@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ int net_init_tap(const Netdev *netdev, const char *name,
>              return -1;
>          }
>
> -        fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
> +        qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
>
>          vnet_hdr = tap_probe_vnet_hdr(fd);
>
> @@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ int net_init_tap(const Netdev *netdev, const char *name,
>                  goto free_fail;
>              }
>
> -            fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
> +            qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
>
>              if (i == 0) {
>                  vnet_hdr = tap_probe_vnet_hdr(fd);
> @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ free_fail:
>              return -1;
>          }
>
> -        fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
> +        qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
>          vnet_hdr = tap_probe_vnet_hdr(fd);
>
>          net_init_tap_one(tap, peer, "bridge", name, ifname,
> --
> 2.11.0
>
>


-- 
Marc-André Lureau

Reply via email to