On 2019-01-22 13:51, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> When hotplugging a PCI bridge right now to the root port, we resolve
> pci_get_bus(pdev)->parent_dev, which results in a SEGFAULT. Hotplugging
> really only works right now when hotplugging to another bridge.
>
> Instead, we have to properly check if we are already at the root.
>
> Let's cleanup the code while at it a bit and factor out updating the
> subordiante bus number into a separate function. The check for
> "old_nr < nr" is right now not strictly necessary, but makes it more
> obvious what is actually going on.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> index b7c4613fde..9b5c5fff60 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> @@ -843,6 +843,21 @@ static void s390_pcihost_pre_plug(HotplugHandler
> *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> }
> }
>
> +static void s390_pci_update_subordinate(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t nr)
> +{
> + uint32_t old_nr;
> +
> + pci_default_write_config(dev, PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS, nr, 1);
> + while (!pci_bus_is_root(pci_get_bus(dev))) {
> + dev = pci_get_bus(dev)->parent_dev;
> +
> + old_nr = pci_default_read_config(dev, PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS, 1);
> + if (old_nr < nr) {
> + pci_default_write_config(dev, PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS, nr, 1);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void s390_pcihost_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> {
> @@ -851,26 +866,21 @@ static void s390_pcihost_plug(HotplugHandler
> *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev = NULL;
>
> if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_PCI_BRIDGE)) {
> - BusState *bus;
> PCIBridge *pb = PCI_BRIDGE(dev);
> - PCIDevice *pdev = PCI_DEVICE(dev);
>
> + pdev = PCI_DEVICE(dev);
Why not keep the direct assignment?
> pci_bridge_map_irq(pb, dev->id, s390_pci_map_irq);
> pci_setup_iommu(&pb->sec_bus, s390_pci_dma_iommu, s);
>
> - bus = BUS(&pb->sec_bus);
> - qbus_set_hotplug_handler(bus, DEVICE(s), errp);
> + qbus_set_hotplug_handler(BUS(&pb->sec_bus), DEVICE(s), errp);
>
> if (dev->hotplugged) {
> pci_default_write_config(pdev, PCI_PRIMARY_BUS,
> pci_dev_bus_num(pdev), 1);
> s->bus_no += 1;
> pci_default_write_config(pdev, PCI_SECONDARY_BUS, s->bus_no, 1);
> - do {
> - pdev = pci_get_bus(pdev)->parent_dev;
> - pci_default_write_config(pdev, PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS,
> - s->bus_no, 1);
> - } while (pci_get_bus(pdev) && pci_dev_bus_num(pdev));
> +
> + s390_pci_update_subordinate(pdev, s->bus_no);
While your changes look OK at a first glance, and certainly fix the
crash, I wonder whether this is the right thing to do here at all. Why
does the hypervisor set up the all the bridge registers here? I'd rather
expect that this is the job of the guest after it detects a hot-plugged
device?
Also I'm not sure whether the numbering is right in every case. Let's
use the example from the URL that you've mentioned in the cover letter
(http://www.science.unitn.it/~fiorella/guidelinux/tlk/node76.html step 4):
Assume that you hot-plug another bridge "5" to "Bridge 2". If I get the
code right, the setup will now look like this:
CPU
|
--------------+-------------- Bus 0
|
| Pri=0
BR1 Sec=1
| Sub=5
|
------+-------+----------+--- Bus 1
| |
| Pri=1 | Pri=1
BR3 Sec=3 BR2 Sec=2
| Sub=4 | Sub=5
| |
--+---+--- Bus 3 --+-+- Bus 2
| |
| Pri=3 | Pri=2
BR4 Sec=4 BR5 Sec=5
| Sub=4 | Sub=5
| |
--+---- Bus 4 --+-- Bus 5
Requests to bus 3 and 4 are now also routed through to bus 2 and 5. That
sounds wrong to me. Or is this how hot-plugging of PCI bridges is
supposed to work??
Thomas
