On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:54:39PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 08.03.2011 um 09:29 schrieb Peter Maydell: > > >Maybe we should have a patchset that does the uncontroversial > >change (bits32->uint32_t &c, which I think should be purely > >mechanical) while we argue about this bit? > > That should be patch 03 (or 02-03). :) >
I have just applied patches 01 to 03. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
