On 19.02.19 13:50, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > If the qcow2 image does not have any encryption method specified in its > header, the user should not be providing any encryption options when > opening it. We already detect this if the user had set "encrypt.format" > but this field is optional so must consider any "encrypt.*" option to be > an error. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> > --- > block/qcow2.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/block/qcow2.c b/block/qcow2.c > index 65a54c9ac6..ecc577175f 100644 > --- a/block/qcow2.c > +++ b/block/qcow2.c > @@ -1045,6 +1045,12 @@ static int > qcow2_update_options_prepare(BlockDriverState *bs, > ret = -EINVAL; > goto fail; > } > + if (encryptopts && qdict_size(encryptopts)) { > + error_setg(errp, "No encryption in image header, but encryption " > + "options provided"); > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto fail; > + }
Doesn't this make the block right before this one a bit superfluous? Max > break; > > case QCOW_CRYPT_AES: >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature