On 19.02.19 13:50, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> If the qcow2 image does not have any encryption method specified in its
> header, the user should not be providing any encryption options when
> opening it. We already detect this if the user had set "encrypt.format"
> but this field is optional so must consider any "encrypt.*" option to be
> an error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/qcow2.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/qcow2.c b/block/qcow2.c
> index 65a54c9ac6..ecc577175f 100644
> --- a/block/qcow2.c
> +++ b/block/qcow2.c
> @@ -1045,6 +1045,12 @@ static int 
> qcow2_update_options_prepare(BlockDriverState *bs,
>              ret = -EINVAL;
>              goto fail;
>          }
> +        if (encryptopts && qdict_size(encryptopts)) {
> +            error_setg(errp, "No encryption in image header, but encryption "
> +                       "options provided");
> +            ret = -EINVAL;
> +            goto fail;
> +        }

Doesn't this make the block right before this one a bit superfluous?

Max

>          break;
>  
>      case QCOW_CRYPT_AES:
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to