On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 03:50:04PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 08:51:21 +0800
>Wei Yang <richardw.y...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Three trivial cleanup for pc-dimm.
>>
>> Patch [1] remove the check on class->hotpluggable since pc-dimm is always
>> hotpluggable.
>> Patch [2] remove nvdimm_realize
>> Patch [2] remove pcdimm realize-callback
>even though this series doesn't break anything, I disagree with it
>conceptually as it makes device less abstracted and make it more
>dependent on how existing machine code uses it.
>I'd drop whole series.
>
Is Patch [1] also make device more dependent on existing implementation?
For example, when we look at the counterpart of acpi_memory_plug_cb():
acpi_pcihp_device_plug_cb
which handle the pci device hotplug. We don't check the hotpluggable
property for pci devices.
To me, this is a general rule for PCDIMM, they are hotpluggable.
For Patch[2][3], I agree with you.
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
