On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:21:32PM +1100, David Gibson wrote: > At present, when seccomp support is compiled out with --disable-seccomp > we fail with an error if the user puts -sandbox on the command line. > > That kind of makes sense, but it's a bit strange that we reject a request > to disable sandboxing with "-sandbox off" saying we don't support > sandboxing. > > This puts in a small sandbox to (correctly) silently ignore -sandbox off > when we don't have sandboxing support compiled in. This makes life easier > for testcases, since they can safely specify "-sandbox off" without having > to care if the qemu they're using is compiled with sandbox support or not. > > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> > --- > vl.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com>
