On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:09:31 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> The new facility is called "Vector-Packed-Decimal-Enhancement Facility"
> and not "Vector BCD enhancements facility 1". As the shortname might
> have already found its way into some backports lets keep vxbeh.
s/lets/let's/
>
> Fixes: 54d65de0b525 ("s390x/cpumodel: vector enhancements")
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
> ---
> target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
> b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
> index ef190e2fc783..3118a9f89228 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ DEF_FEAT(CMM_NT, "cmmnt", STFL, 147, "CMM:
> ESSA-enhancement (no translate) facil
> DEF_FEAT(VECTOR_ENH2, "vxeh2", STFL, 148, "Vector Enhancements facility 2")
> DEF_FEAT(ESORT_BASE, "esort-base", STFL, 150, "Enhanced-sort facility
> (excluding subfunctions)")
> DEF_FEAT(DEFLATE_BASE, "deflate-base", STFL, 151, "Deflate-conversion
> facility (excluding subfunctions)")
> -DEF_FEAT(VECTOR_BCD_ENH, "vxbeh", STFL, 152, "Vector BCD enhancements
> facility 1")
> +DEF_FEAT(VECTOR_BCD_ENH, "vxbeh", STFL, 152,
> "Vector-Packed-Decimal-Enhancement Facility")
> DEF_FEAT(MSA_EXT_9, "msa9-base", STFL, 155,
> "Message-security-assist-extension-9 facility (excluding subfunctions)")
> DEF_FEAT(ETOKEN, "etoken", STFL, 156, "Etoken facility")
>
I like this one better than v1, as it seems less risky (and I think we
can live with the odd shortname; it's not like all facilities are named
in an obvious way...)
I'll queue this first thing tomorrow, unless someone objects.
