On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 06:54, Joel Stanley <j...@jms.id.au> wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 12:26, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On 04/07/19 12:13, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 11:26:53AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > >> CC'ing Stefan & Paolo for a non-ARM view on this... > > > > > > I'm not familiar with the various clock smoothing techniques implemented > > > in QEMU and KVM, but this looks okay given that Linux guests expect > > > this. > > > > Yeah, even KVM applies a minimum period of 200us to the x86 LAPIC timer. > > Can we please merge this so guests can boot on 4.1?
Cédric pointed out this lacks my reviewed by. I had not provided it in the past as I wondered if we could come up with a better fix. However, I consider this a good fix for 4.1, and if sometime finds time to further rework the timer model in the future then we can do that work later. Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <j...@jms.id.au> Tested-by: Joel Stanley <j...@jms.id.au> Cheers, Joel
