On 7/16/19 9:00 AM, Joel Stanley wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 06:54, Joel Stanley <j...@jms.id.au> wrote: >> >> Hi Peter, >> >> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 12:26, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 04/07/19 12:13, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 11:26:53AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>>>> CC'ing Stefan & Paolo for a non-ARM view on this... >>>> >>>> I'm not familiar with the various clock smoothing techniques implemented >>>> in QEMU and KVM, but this looks okay given that Linux guests expect >>>> this. >>> >>> Yeah, even KVM applies a minimum period of 200us to the x86 LAPIC timer. >> >> Can we please merge this so guests can boot on 4.1? > > Cédric pointed out this lacks my reviewed by. I had not provided it in > the past as I wondered if we could come up with a better fix. However, > I consider this a good fix for 4.1, and if sometime finds time to > further rework the timer model in the future then we can do that work > later.
Agreed. > > Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <j...@jms.id.au> > Tested-by: Joel Stanley <j...@jms.id.au> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
