Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> writes:

> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 02:05:36PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> hw/boards.h pulls in almost 60 headers.  The less we include it into
>> headers, the better.  As a first step, drop superfluous inclusions,
>> and downgrade some more to what's actually needed.  Gets rid of just
>> one inclusion into a header.
>> 
>> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelb...@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>
> The following files use the MACHINE macro and require
> hw/boards.h, but are touched by this patch:
>
> hw/acpi/cpu.c:    MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c:    MachineState *machine = 
> MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> hw/i386/intel_iommu.c:    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> hw/i386/x86-iommu.c:    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c:    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c:    MachineState *machine = 
> MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c:    MachineState *machine = 
> MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());

Since they still compile, they obviously still get it indirectly.  I'll
drop these hunks.

> Maybe there are other files touched by this patch that require
> struct MachineClass or struct MachineState contents to be
> defined, but this is a bit trickier to verify.

I tried to exclude those, but I might have screwed it up, just like I
screwed up for MACHINE().  I'll double-check.

Thanks!

Reply via email to