On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:22:39AM -0400, Richard Henderson wrote: > I would be hesitant to call this just "lduw_be"; I think that's confusing when > it's calling lduw_be_p. But perhaps "wrap_*" or "wide_*"?
Agree, some hamming distance is needed. "wrap_*", "wide_*", or "direct_*" all works for me.
