On 10/04/19 00:54, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Document io_fw_cfg_init() return value must be released
> with g_free(). Directly calling g_free() we don't really
> need io_fw_cfg_uninit(): remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/libqos/fw_cfg.c | 5 -----
> tests/libqos/fw_cfg.h | 11 +++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/libqos/fw_cfg.c b/tests/libqos/fw_cfg.c
> index 1f46258f96..37c3f2cf4d 100644
> --- a/tests/libqos/fw_cfg.c
> +++ b/tests/libqos/fw_cfg.c
> @@ -157,8 +157,3 @@ QFWCFG *io_fw_cfg_init(QTestState *qts, uint16_t base)
>
> return fw_cfg;
> }
> -
> -void io_fw_cfg_uninit(QFWCFG *fw_cfg)
> -{
> - g_free(fw_cfg);
> -}
> diff --git a/tests/libqos/fw_cfg.h b/tests/libqos/fw_cfg.h
> index 13325cc4ff..15604040bd 100644
> --- a/tests/libqos/fw_cfg.h
> +++ b/tests/libqos/fw_cfg.h
> @@ -36,8 +36,15 @@ size_t qfw_cfg_get_file(QFWCFG *fw_cfg, const char
> *filename,
>
> QFWCFG *mm_fw_cfg_init(QTestState *qts, uint64_t base);
> void mm_fw_cfg_uninit(QFWCFG *fw_cfg);
> +/**
> + * io_fw_cfg_init():
> + * @qts: The #QTestState that will be referred to by the QFWCFG object.
> + * @base: The I/O address of the fw_cfg device in the guest.
> + *
> + * Returns a newly allocated QFWCFG object which must be released
> + * with a call to g_free() when no longer required.
> + */
> QFWCFG *io_fw_cfg_init(QTestState *qts, uint16_t base);
> -void io_fw_cfg_uninit(QFWCFG *fw_cfg);
>
> static inline QFWCFG *pc_fw_cfg_init(QTestState *qts)
> {
> @@ -46,7 +53,7 @@ static inline QFWCFG *pc_fw_cfg_init(QTestState *qts)
>
> static inline void pc_fw_cfg_uninit(QFWCFG *fw_cfg)
> {
> - io_fw_cfg_uninit(fw_cfg);
> + g_free(fw_cfg);
> }
>
> #endif
>
This more or less reverts 0729d833d6d6 ("tests/libqos: Add
io_fw_cfg_uninit() and mm_fw_cfg_uninit()", 2019-05-23).
I'm fine either way.
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
